Colonial Chrome

Home of the Stuffyards


It is currently Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:22 am

All times are UTC



Welcome
Welcome to <strong>Colonial Chrome</strong>.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: HT-1800
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Brighton, England
Highscores: 14
Is up and running.

_________________
Kneel Before Zod


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:04 am 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
**Moved from request thread**
Admiral wrote:
The TL-1800 is up and running.

First big build for quite a while, but I think it works.

Looks good!!

First off, just out of curiosity... Why add this ship to the CEC naming convention, its manufactured by Suwantek Systems?? (Im not against it, I think the HT fits it as it can be considered a Heavy transport with the external pods attached.

Onto the Praise... The layout makes suite some sense as per the small description in Allegiance. The Dorsal Hatch that Solo, Luke and Chewie came up thru in the book seems it would be around the hygene or aft bunks and the rooms fit what Solo saw, so I think it works well. The gunnery stations up front make sense as the guns are right there... I assumed they were in the cockpit, but the cockpit seemed a little small as per the images on Wookieepedia, so I think this layout is better! The only thing I would change is to shift the port side bunks aft and put the autochef room directly aft of the lounge... just me, but I would hate to be walking down the passageway with a place of food and someone walk out and knock it out of my hands... otherwise I think you put the description in the book into visual form perfectly!

On a side note, any reason for the differently shaped nose?? I kinda like it, just curious as to the change. I began modeling this guy after my request above... Here are my results: Suwantek Parked with a Barloz Freighter and Suwantek in flight with a Barloz Freighter. I think I will go back and tweak it to match your hull design... this version doesnt really look like the freighter it is supposed to be. Might you have a maquette or side elevation, those you gave me of the HT-2200 were rather helpful.

Diji


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:30 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Brighton, England
Highscores: 14
Quote:
First off, just out of curiosity... Why add this ship to the CEC naming convention, its manufactured by Suwantek Systems?

Because it has a huge amount of CEC design cues.

Quote:
The layout makes suite some sense as per the small description in Allegiance.

Never read it. I'd never consider it a source in any case, so any similarity is purely coincidental.

Quote:
The only thing I would change is to shift the port side bunks aft and put the autochef room directly aft of the lounge.

I would agree, that'd make more sense. The main reason for it being that way round is that it matches the WEG deckplan a little better, though having it by the hygiene units also means the amount of plumbing is reduced.

Quote:
On a side note, any reason for the differently shaped nose?

Differently shaped than what? The nose on mine matches three of the four known images of the ship.

Quote:
Might you have a maquette or side elevation, those you gave me of the HT-2200 were rather helpful.

I have a very rough one, I'll mail it to you shortly.

_________________
Kneel Before Zod


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:25 pm 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
Admiral wrote:
Quote:
First off, just out of curiosity... Why add this ship to the CEC naming convention, its manufactured by Suwantek Systems?

Because it has a huge amount of CEC design cues.

Understood... Ill take your word for it, Ive only seen a few of the CEC ships, so thats cool with me.

Admiral wrote:
Quote:
The layout makes suite some sense as per the small description in Allegiance.

Never read it. I'd never consider it a source in any case, so any similarity is purely coincidental.

I figured you wouldnt include it as a source, but considering the general shape of the ship doesnt allow for much diversity, its pretty much a straight passageway, cargo rooms aft, then cabins, then lounge, then cockpit. In the book, this ship is an Imperial Security Bureau used by a group of Stormtrooper deserters after they killed an ISB major. It is highly retrofitted, much like almost any ship in the SW universe, heh. But the troopers end up meeting up with Han, Luke and Chewie, and they dock the falcon to the ventral hatch (sorry, said dorsal in previous post) and as Han climbs onboard the Suwantek, Timothy Zahn describes what Han sees as he makes his way thru the ship. Anyhow, its a good book if you are into it, takes place between EP 4 and 5 (my favorite timeframe in the SW universe).

Admiral wrote:
Quote:
The only thing I would change is to shift the port side bunks aft and put the autochef room directly aft of the lounge.

I would agree, that'd make more sense. The main reason for it being that way round is that it matches the WEG deckplan a little better, though having it by the hygiene units also means the amount of plumbing is reduced.

Heh, never thought about plumbing, but it makes sense. As for the WEG deskplan, Ive never seen it... Im actually on the trail of a few WEG books, A guy at my local gaming store is working on finding some for me... We'll see how that goes. I only have a few books, otherwise I use wookieepedia and my salt-shaker (since we all know their stats are not 100% accurate)

Admiral wrote:
Quote:
On a side note, any reason for the differently shaped nose?

Differently shaped than what? The nose on mine matches three of the four known images of the ship.

This would have to be my ignorance again... Ive only found 2 images of this ship, and one seemed to be an edited version of the first... the image I used for my model was that from Wookieepedia.

Admiral wrote:
Quote:
Might you have a maquette or side elevation, those you gave me of the HT-2200 were rather helpful.

I have a very rough one, I'll mail it to you shortly.
Thanks!!


Last edited by Diji Spiritstalker on Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 11:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Brighton, England
Highscores: 14
Quote:
In the book, this ship is an Imperial Security Bureau used by a group of Stormtrooper deserters after they killed an ISB major.

This would be an example of why I don't cite the pulp fiction as a viable source, or indeed, read them.

Quote:
Anyhow, its a good book if you are into it

No, there are no good Star Wars books.

Quote:
As for the WEG deckplan, Ive never seen it.

It's on the Wookipedia page.

Quote:
This would have to be my ignorance again... Ive only found 2 images of this ship, and one seemed to be an edited version of the first... the image I used for my model was that from Wookieepedia.

Wookipedia has three of the four - Wald's version, and the two from Stock Ships. The last is in Pirates and Privateers.

_________________
Kneel Before Zod


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:41 pm 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
Admiral wrote:
Quote:
As for the WEG deckplan, Ive never seen it.

It's on the Wookipedia page.

Quote:
This would have to be my ignorance again... Ive only found 2 images of this ship, and one seemed to be an edited version of the first... the image I used for my model was that from Wookieepedia.

Wookipedia has three of the four - Wald's version, and the two from Stock Ships. The last is in Pirates and Privateers.

I think we are looking at two different pages. When I search Wookieepedia for this ship, I search "TL-1800" and the only page that comes up (in fact, it goes right there) has a single image on it... the same image I get under a Google images search. No deckplan, or other images.

Diji


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Brighton, England
Highscores: 14
Odd, it was there when I first started looking at the ship. It is not there now. Ach well, c'est la vie.

_________________
Kneel Before Zod


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:26 am 
Offline
Technician
Technician

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 10:23 pm
Posts: 18
Highscores: 6
Do you have any pics (even a rough sketch) showing how and where the cargo pods clamp on?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:03 am 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
I do not have any images of the cargo pods... I struggled to find any pics at all of this ship. But looking at what I was able to decipher, and Admiral can correct me if Im wrong, but I would assume the cargo pods would clamp onto the sides where the hull tapers out. I could picture Rhombus shaped cargo pods that could attach to the tapered sections of the ship's hull overlaping some. But I also picture this ship to be much like the YT-1300, much favored by scoundrelous types... so the optional cargo pod function might not be used frequently.

All in all, I really wish there was more information on this ship. Especially for Gamers, since it could handle a party very well, and from what I have read, it is just as customizable as the YT ships, in fact, I think it could very well be a replacement for the YT-1300 that so may gaming parties use.

Putting some more thought into this, I think it would be really cool if said pods would not affect the ship's ability to land, could be permenantly attached, and made habitable (ie atmosphere and lifesupport), thus adding that much extra space to the ship.

Admiral, if you had any thoughts or insight into this cargo pod aspect, Id love to hear it... It wouldnt hurt to model the cargo pods incase I have a need to include this ship with cargo pods attached in my project.

Diji


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Brighton, England
Highscores: 14
Quote:
Do you have any pics (even a rough sketch) showing how and where the cargo pods clamp on?

Not yet, I'll do some modelly work this evening and upload a render or two. (Edit - http://www.colonialchrome.co.uk/OthersI ... ender1.png and http://www.colonialchrome.co.uk/OthersI ... ender2.png) I don't see much need to deckplan them.
They'll be bolted, essentially, one each of the four main surfaces of the centre flat section.

Quote:
Putting some more thought into this, I think it would be really cool if said pods would not affect the ship's ability to land, could be permenantly attached, and made habitable (ie atmosphere and lifesupport), thus adding that much extra space to the ship.

The ship's stats directly state that it can only have one attached when in an atmosphere, so I'm not inclined to allow them to be permanent. Under most commonly accepted conversion schemes these pods would have 100 cubic meters volume, which isn't very large.

_________________
Kneel Before Zod


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:10 pm 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
Admiral wrote:
...They'll be bolted, essentially, one each of the four main surfaces of the centre flat section...The ship's stats directly state that it can only have one attached when in an atmosphere, so I'm not inclined to allow them to be permanent. Under most commonly accepted conversion schemes these pods would have 100 cubic meters volume, which isn't very large.

Understood, and thanks for the visual!! I completely missed the part that stated only one pod could be maintained in atmosphere. Rather odd but I can see it due to the state of the engines described (you would think knowing the capabilities of what they were designing, that the engines would be built to accomodate all four pods in atmosphere, even if that meant adding a sixth as opposed to the five it has).

After seeing the visual Admiral provided I retract my previous thought tangent... I can agree that the extra 400m3 of space probably wouldnt give much at all, except maybe some extra deck heigth toward the outward most areas of the hull, maybe providing larger cabins, etc... but if such a modification were made to the ship, it would never break atmosphere unless its engines were upgraded to accomodate the extra weight of the pods.

Diji


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:39 am 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
Admiral wrote:
Quote:
First off, just out of curiosity... Why add this ship to the CEC naming convention, its manufactured by Suwantek Systems?

Because it has a huge amount of CEC design cues.

Just thought of something as I was naming this ship's model in Max... I can see your CEC name conversion here and seeing how Suwantek only released two ships (that Wookieepedia accounts for), the TL-1800 and the TL-1200 (a smaller, three-engine version of this ship), I would even go as far as to give this ship the nickname "Suwantek"... first becasue that is how it is referred to in the book
Wookieepedia on the TL-1800, Gilla wrote:
Its aliases during the journey included Ville Brok and Melnor Spear, although the stormtroopers would simply refer to it as "the Suwantek."
and second as a cue to the manufacturer that it is said to have come from (even though I can completely see your CEC roots). Just a thought...

Diji


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 4:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 2:05 pm
Posts: 314
Location: Brighton, England
Highscores: 14
Maybe, maybe. Of course that would potentially cause minor confusion if i ever get round to doing the amazingly ugly 1200.

_________________
Kneel Before Zod


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: HT-1800
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:22 am 
Offline
Technician Overseer
Technician Overseer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:25 am
Posts: 46
Admiral wrote:
Maybe, maybe. Of course that would potentially cause minor confusion if i ever get round to doing the amazingly ugly 1200.

Yeah, I thought about that, but I feel the same as you do about that ship... and what does it offer that the 1800 cant deliver... while its not the best thing to do, but I wouldnt be too upset if we forgot about it... or we can give it its own name, more suited for something of its caliber

D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Hosted by FreeForums.org | Create a free forum
Skin by Lucas Kane