Quote:
Chrome, read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2suit That took literally thirty seconds of googling to find. Now apologize to Tiree and go be arrogant somewhere else.
You're absolutely right there, Kayle. That IS a harness, and definitely WAS the result of a NASA project.
Ah, no, wait, those are pajamas. And, lemme see, yeah, nothing whatsoever to do with NASA.
Forgive me if I'm wrong, I could be, it happens, but wasn't the point I was making that Sharlin was just spouting bovine excrement when he spoke so eloquently of NASA's huge experiment with "The Kama Sutra of Zero Gravity"?
I think I was, no, I'm verging on certain I was. Yeah, look, if you read the words in my post, they're right there. You missed them, evidently. Now, I know you've had a lot of trouble with reading, what with the head injuries and all, and I know you've got into this kind of trouble in the past. Many, many times if memory serves. So I'll put my points again, and try to be clearer.
Neither NASA nor the MAKD have ever invested so much as a dime in investigating these areas of peurile fantasy.
I was going to call Sharlin on his claims that NASA found eating a tomato is space was beneficial as I believe that to be pure fantasy as well, but opted not to because he's clearly a - Ah, no, this is my Forum after all -
fucktard, and anyone who thinks Fox News is any less fiction than Scooby Doo is someone whose grip on reality is less than firm at best.
I'm pretty sure after re-reading my post that my comment to Tiree was perfectly polite and amounted to "I think you're wrong, and you may be confusing this with that, but if not, provide a source."
Now, you can call me arrogant, it's probably fair. It is arrogance brought on mainly by doing real research and real engineering longer than you've been on solid food. Your arrogance, of course, has become so legendary in the online SWRPG community that you even allude to it in your own signature. The thing is, Kayle, that, personally, half of the time I read posts by you I think "Ah, this guy does have his head on." The other half of the time I think "This guy is in a different world to the rest of us."
Is it possible your personal dislike of me is getting in the way of your being able to understand my points? It does seem possible, normally you're able to come up with much more valid counter-arguements than 'look, here are space-pajamas made by a hippy who likes screwing in the vomit-comet.'